Author Archives: Egg Syntax

Why the parties can’t decide – by Matthew Yglesias

Very interesting points here, which among other things suggest that regardless of how badly last week’s debate hurt Biden’s chances, Democrats don’t really have the institutional capability to pick someone else.

If you decide after delving into the data that you need to warn “Democrats” about something and you give them a call, it turns out there’s nobody picking up the phone. Of course, the DNC and RNC do exist and they have staffers in the building who will literally pick up the phone. But the party committees don’t amount to anything. Neither do the quadrennial national conventions. Neither do the state parties. We have a lot of partisanship, but that’s largely negative partisanship, not affective affiliation with the party you usually vote for. The parties barely exist as institutions, but beyond that, even to the extent that they exist as a loose constellation of related entities, those entities lack social legitimacy and can’t steer events.

That presents itself most obviously in the spectacle of willfully nominated unpopular presidential contenders. But it arguably has more dire implications in terms of the difficulties it creates for setting priorities and making political decisions — if the public’s desires and interests can’t be constructively channeled through political parties, then we’re more likely to ping pong between stasis and demagoguery.

Democracy needs political parties, and the United States of America doesn’t really have them.

Why the parties can’t decide – by Matthew Yglesias

The dangers of exaggerating or denying group differences

Sometimes, groups are genuinely found to differ a bit, on average. For instance, it may be found that men are a bit more dishonest than women or that kids from East Asian countries outperform American kids at math, on average. Situations like this often involve people jumping to inaccurate conclusions and spreading misinformation. In this article, we’ll explore why, as well as how to think more clearly about these kinds of situations.

http://clearerthinking.org/post/how-to-think-about-group-differences

Measuring Trends in Leisure: The Allocation of Time Over Five Decades

459 citations, so is presumably considered solid.

In this paper, we use five decades of time-use surveys to document trends in the allocation of time within the United States. We find that a dramatic increase in leisure time lies behind the relatively stable number of market hours worked between 1965 and 2003. Specifically, using a variety of definitions for leisure, we show that leisure for men increased by roughly six to nine hours per week (driven by a decline in market work hours) and for women by roughly four to eight hours per week (driven by a decline in home production work hours). Lastly, we document a growing inequality in leisure that is the mirror image of the growing inequality of wages and expenditures, making welfare calculation based solely on the latter series incomplete.

Source: Measuring Trends in Leisure: The Allocation of Time Over Five Decades* | The Quarterly Journal of Economics | Oxford Academic

Pentagon ran secret anti-vax campaign to incite fear of China vaccines

This is absolutely horrifying.

At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. military launched a secret campaign to counter what it perceived as China’s growing influence in the Philippines, a nation hit especially hard by the deadly virus.

The clandestine operation has not been previously reported. It aimed to sow doubt about the safety and efficacy of vaccines and other life-saving aid that was being supplied by China, a Reuters investigation found. Through phony internet accounts meant to impersonate Filipinos, the military’s propaganda efforts morphed into an anti-vax campaign. Social media posts decried the quality of face masks, test kits and the first vaccine that would become available in the Philippines – China’s Sinovac inoculation.

Pentagon ran secret anti-vax campaign to incite fear of China vaccines

New Lives in the City: How Taleban have experienced life in Kabul

Another thing I don’t like, not only about Kabul but broadly about life after the fatha, are the new restrictions. In the group, we had a great degree of freedom about where to go, where to stay, and whether to participate in the war.

However, these days, you have to go to the office before 8 AM and stay there till 4 PM. If you don’t go, you’re considered absent, and [the wage for] that day is cut from your salary. We’re now used to that, but it was especially difficult in the first two or three months.

https://www.afghanistan-analysts.org/en/reports/context-culture/new-lives-in-the-city-how-taleban-have-experienced-life-in-kabul/

Getting to grips with an extra thumb

The videos are really fun.

Dani Clode, a collaborator within Professor Makin’s lab, has developed the Third Thumb, an extra robotic thumb aimed at increasing the wearer’s range of movement, enhancing their grasping capability and expanding the carrying capacity of the hand. This allows the user to perform tasks that might be otherwise challenging or impossible to complete with one hand or to perform complex multi-handed tasks without having to coordinate with other people.

The Third Thumb is worn on the opposite side of the palm to the biological thumb and controlled by a pressure sensor placed under each big toe or foot. Pressure from the right toe pulls the Thumb across the hand, while the pressure exerted with the left toe pulls the Thumb up toward the fingers. The extent of the Thumb’s movement is proportional to the pressure applied, and releasing pressure moves it back to its original position.

https://www.cam.ac.uk/stories/third-thumb

London Photos II

We’re staying in one of these charming early-19th century townhouses…

 

 

…in the admittedly less charming basement:

 

Condiments are clearly labeled as such.

 

Whereas orange juice is worryingly unspecific.

 

Lawns are cut somewhat less short. 

Some housing appears to still be segregated.

UK / London Photos

The UK

 

The parks are appealingly unkempt and some of them contain this beautiful woman.

 

Genuinely charming anti-vax sticker

 

Post offices are underground, and you can still send telegraphs

 

Watch out for the paint

Tight and Loose Cultures

An interesting axis on which to consider culture.

One of the most important aspects of culture that we take for granted is our social norms. We follow norms constantly. And we rarely recognize how much we need norms: social norms are the glue that keep us together, they give us our identity and help us to coordinate and cooperate at such a remarkable level. What’s more, social norms are the key that unlocks societal order, and even the possibility of constructing a human society. If people didn’t abide by socially expected rules, their behavior would be unbearably unpredictable. We wouldn’t be able to coordinate our actions to do most anything—from getting place-to-place to having meaningful conversations to running schools, organizations, and our governments.

But my research has shown that some groups have much stronger norms than others; they’re tight. Others have much weaker norms; they’re loose. Of course, all cultures have areas in which they are tight and loose—but cultures vary in the degree to which they emphasize norms and compliance with them. Since I got my Ph.D. in cross-cultural psychology, I’ve been studying tight-loose cultures in over a hundred groups, and I’ve discovered that this distinction can help us understand differences across nations, states, organizations, and social classes, and even our own households. It’s what I call a “fractal pattern” of culture. Remarkably, tight-loose has a very similar pattern in terms of its antecedents and consequences across different levels. Tight-loose also causes a lot of conflict, but once we understand its logic, we cultivate greater cultural empathy and manage our divides more constructively.

https://behavioralscientist.org/tight-and-loose-cultures-a-conversation-with-michele-gelfand/

The Gentle Seduction

A lovely little short story from 1989.

“Have you ever heard of Singularity?” he asked.

She shook her head. “What’s that?”

“Singularity is a time in the future. It’ll occur when the rate of change of technology is very great–so great that the effort to keep up with the change will overwhelm us. People will face a whole new set of problems that we can’t even imagine.” A look of great tranquility smoothed the ridges around his eyes. “On the other hand, all our normal, day to day problems fade away. For example, you’ll be immortal.”

She shook her head with distaste. “I don’t want to live forever,” she said.

He smiled, his eyes twinkling. “Of course you do, you just don’t know it yet.”

http://skyhunter.com/marcs/GentleSeduction.html